Sovereign

ETF comparison

CNDX vs IEEN

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (BlackRock) against iShares MSCI EMU Energy UCITS ETF (BlackRock). Compare fee drag, CAGR, dividend yield, and sector concentration.

BlackRock

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

CNDX · NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking

Ireland

Accumulating

Expense ratio

0.33%

5Y CAGR

15.4%

Dividend yield

0.7%

Fund size

$10.2B

Top holdings

MicrosoftAppleNVIDIAAmazonMeta

BlackRock

iShares MSCI EMU Energy UCITS ETF

IEEN · MSCI EMU Energy

Ireland

Distributing

Expense ratio

0.25%

5Y CAGR

6.2%

Dividend yield

3.9%

Fund size

0,9 €B

Top holdings

TotalEnergiesENIRepsolOMVEquinor

Scenario

1,000 per month · 15 years

CNDX balance

$695,645

IEEN balance

295.829 €

Fee drag delta

-0.08%

Inflation assumption

2.0%

Use cases

Allocation notes

  • CNDX acts as global core beta with `Accumulating` distribution, ideal for automated savings plans.
  • IEEN offers concentrated growth exposure. Pair with a global core to avoid overweighting mega-cap tech.

Related ETF comparisons

FAQ

Which ETF has the lower expense ratio: CNDX or IEEN?

CNDX charges 0.33% while IEEN charges 0.25%. The fee delta compounds significantly over 15 years.

FAQ

How do projected balances compare with 1,000 USD monthly?

Investing $1,000 per month for 15 years yields $695,645 with CNDX versus 295.829 € with IEEN.

FAQ

Which fund suits long-term core allocation?

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF targets NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking, whereas iShares MSCI EMU Energy UCITS ETF focuses on MSCI EMU Energy. Choose the fund whose coverage and volatility profile align with your broader portfolio construction.

Extend the cluster

VWRPCNDXVUSAIWDAEQQQIEEN

Use the comparison builder to generate any slug using the format /comparison/{etf-a}-vs-{etf-b}.