Sovereign

ETF comparison

VWRP vs CNDX

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Vanguard) against iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (BlackRock). Compare fee drag, CAGR, dividend yield, and sector concentration.

Vanguard

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF

VWRP · FTSE All-World Market Cap Weighted

Ireland

Accumulating

Expense ratio

0.22%

5Y CAGR

9.8%

Dividend yield

1.8%

Fund size

$14.6B

Top holdings

AppleMicrosoftNVIDIAAmazonAlphabet

BlackRock

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

CNDX · NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking

Ireland

Accumulating

Expense ratio

0.33%

5Y CAGR

15.4%

Dividend yield

0.7%

Fund size

$10.2B

Top holdings

MicrosoftAppleNVIDIAAmazonMeta

Scenario

1,000 per month · 15 years

VWRP balance

$406,941

CNDX balance

$695,645

Fee drag delta

0.11%

Inflation assumption

2.0%

Use cases

Allocation notes

  • VWRP acts as global core beta with `Accumulating` distribution, ideal for automated savings plans.
  • CNDX offers concentrated growth exposure. Pair with a global core to avoid overweighting mega-cap tech.

Related ETF comparisons

FAQ

Which ETF has the lower expense ratio: VWRP or CNDX?

VWRP charges 0.22% while CNDX charges 0.33%. The fee delta compounds significantly over 15 years.

FAQ

How do projected balances compare with 1,000 USD monthly?

Investing $1,000 per month for 15 years yields $406,941 with VWRP versus $695,645 with CNDX.

FAQ

Which fund suits long-term core allocation?

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF targets FTSE All-World Market Cap Weighted, whereas iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF focuses on NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking. Choose the fund whose coverage and volatility profile align with your broader portfolio construction.

Extend the cluster

VWRPCNDXVUSAIWDAEQQQIEEN

Use the comparison builder to generate any slug using the format /comparison/{etf-a}-vs-{etf-b}.