Sovereign

ETF comparison

CNDX vs EQQQ

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (BlackRock) against Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (Invesco). Compare fee drag, CAGR, dividend yield, and sector concentration.

BlackRock

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

CNDX · NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking

Ireland

Accumulating

Expense ratio

0.33%

5Y CAGR

15.4%

Dividend yield

0.7%

Fund size

$10.2B

Top holdings

MicrosoftAppleNVIDIAAmazonMeta

Invesco

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

EQQQ · NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking

Ireland

Distributing

Expense ratio

0.30%

5Y CAGR

15.1%

Dividend yield

0.6%

Fund size

$5.3B

Top holdings

AppleMicrosoftNVIDIAAmazonMeta

Scenario

1,000 per month · 15 years

CNDX balance

$695,645

EQQQ balance

$675,177

Fee drag delta

-0.03%

Inflation assumption

2.0%

Use cases

Allocation notes

  • CNDX acts as global core beta with `Accumulating` distribution, ideal for automated savings plans.
  • EQQQ offers concentrated growth exposure. Pair with a global core to avoid overweighting mega-cap tech.

Related ETF comparisons

FAQ

Which ETF has the lower expense ratio: CNDX or EQQQ?

CNDX charges 0.33% while EQQQ charges 0.30%. The fee delta compounds significantly over 15 years.

FAQ

How do projected balances compare with 1,000 USD monthly?

Investing $1,000 per month for 15 years yields $695,645 with CNDX versus $675,177 with EQQQ.

FAQ

Which fund suits long-term core allocation?

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF targets NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking, whereas Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF focuses on NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking. Choose the fund whose coverage and volatility profile align with your broader portfolio construction.

Extend the cluster

VWRPCNDXVUSAIWDAEQQQIEEN

Use the comparison builder to generate any slug using the format /comparison/{etf-a}-vs-{etf-b}.